ABSTRACT
Objectives: Reporting a case of a COVID-19 vaccinated patient admitted to our intensive care unit with severe acute respiratory failure due to SARSCoV2 - Omicron variant, rapidly deteriorating requiring intubation, prone ventilation, and ECMO support. Method(s): A 62 years old Caucasian male was admitted in ICU for rapidly deranging respiratory failure and fever which occurred over the previous 24h. The patient received two doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine (Oxford, AstraZeneca), the last one over five months before onset of symptoms. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with tachypnea, low peripheral saturation (80%), elevated serum creatinine (2.4 mg/dl), and mild obesity (BMI 34,6). Pressure support ventilation trial (2 hours) failed carryng out to orotracheal intubation and protective ventilation. Worsening of respiratory exchanges (5 th day from the admission) required a rescue prone ventilation cycle, in the meantime an indication was given to the placement of veno-venous ECMO. The cannulation site was femoro-femoral and the configuration used was Vivc25- Va21, according to the current ELSO nomenclature;ECMO flow was progressively increased until a peripheral saturation of 95% was obtained. Result(s): The patient passed out after 2 month of extracorporeal support with no sign of recovery of pulmonary and renal function. Conclusion(s): Unlike evidences showing a lower symptomatic engagement of the Omicron variant SARSCoV2 positive patients, we have witnessed a rapid and massive pulmonary involvement. The short time that passed from the onset of symptoms and the rapid decay of respiratory function required rapid escalation of the intensity of care up to extracorporeal support. The patient showed previous pathologies that can lead to suspicion of a loss of immune coverage given by the vaccine, in addition to the long time elapsed since the last dose. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Cardiac complications in patients with COVID-19 have been described in the literature with an important impact on outcome. The primary objective of our systematic review was to describe the kind of cardiac complications observed in COVID-19 patients and to identify potential predictors of cardiovascular events. The secondary aim was to analyze the effect of cardiac complications on outcome.We performed this systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines using several databases for studies evaluating the type of cardiac complications and risk factors in COVID-19 patients. We also calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI. A random-effects model was applied to analyze the data. The heterogeneity of the retrieved trials was evaluated through the I2 statistic. Our systematic review included 49 studies. Acute cardiac injury was evaluated in 20 articles. Heart failure and cardiogenic shock were reported in 10 articles. Myocardial infarction was evaluated in seven of the papers retrieved. Takotsubo, myocarditis, and pericardial effusion were reported in six, twelve, and five articles, respectively. Arrhythmic complications were evaluated in thirteen studies. Right ventricular dysfunction was evaluated in six articles. We included 7 studies investigating 2115 patients in the meta-analysis. The RR was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.24; P < 0.00001, I2 = 0.75). Acute cardiac injury represented the prevalent cardiac complications observed in COVID-19 patients (from 20 to 45% of the patients). Patients with acute cardiac injury seemed to be significantly older, with comorbidities, more likely to develop complications, and with higher mortality rates. Acute cardiac injury was found to be an independent risk factor for severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and an independent predictor of mortality. Due to the scarce evidence, it was not possible to draw any conclusion regarding Takotsubo, myocarditis, pleural effusion, and right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. Noteworthy, possible arrhythmic alterations (incidence rate of arrhythmia from 3 to 60%) in COVID-19 patients have to be taken into account for the possible complications and the consequent hemodynamic instabilities. Hypertension seemed to represent the most common comorbidities in COVID-19 patients (from 30 to 59.8%). The prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) was high in this group of patients (up to 57%), with coronary artery disease in around 10% of the cases. In the majority of the studies retrieved, patients with CVD had a higher prevalence of severe form, ICU admission, and higher mortality rates.
ABSTRACT
Between March 21 and May 18 2020 we admitted 98 patients with COVID-19 to our ICU of whom 72 required invasive mechanical ventilation. Of these, 3 patients required extracorporeal support: One V-V ECMO for respiratory failure, one V-V ECMO for tracheoesophageal fistula, and one V-AV ECMO for cardiogenic shock due to pulmonary thromboembolism, to which we had to add an extra return cannula to improve oxygenation. Coagulation abnormalities have been described in COVID-19 with an increase in D-dimer, a modest decrease in platelet count, and delay in the prothrombin time (1). Pro-coagulant states however, may not be highlighted by a standard coagulation essay that's why we decided to assess them by ROTEM. Even with an ACT level kept between 180-200s, we found a normal value of aPTT and a ROTEM profile consistent with hypercoagulability: An acceleration of blood clot formation (CFT below the lower limit in INTEM and EXTEM) and a significantly higher clot strength (MCF above the upper limit in INTEM and EXTEM in two patients and in FIBTEM in all patients). For this reason, we titrate heparin infusion to maintain INTEM CT in a range between normal and 100 sec longer for all the ECMO run, without thrombotic complications. Despite the superiority of ROTEM to monitor anticoagulation in ECMO is not yet proven in literature, this test could help us to understand the coagulation profile of each patient and to titrate heparin where the coagulation function is greatly altered by the virus and by the circuit.